nourishing obscurity

10 Responses to “When will they ever learn?”

1. Quiet_Man, on March 4th, 2013 at 20:45 Said:

   The party was a relatively sober affair, the girl was not drunk. Her attackers appear to be what we are coming to know as islamic types with the muslim beard.
   I suspect she was a victim of so called rape jihad. Or the islamic propensity of seeing all western women as whores.
   Quiet_Man recently posted…Fracking idiots

   
   
2. James Higham, on March 4th, 2013 at 21:57 Said:

   Not discounting that for a moment, QM. Fact is though that girl alone, in town with people like those you’ve just described about, walks home at 1 a.m.
   James Higham recently posted…Uggggh, disgusting

   
   
3. Ian Hills, on March 4th, 2013 at 23:39 Said:

   When honorary blonde Lauren Silberman said “I’m really seeking to start nailing those 60-yarders”, she probably meant “I’m going to begin painting my NAILS when the boys start kicking that bouncy egg-shaped thing around”.

   She reminds me of those people think the rear-view mirror is for touching up your make-up before you swing out hard into the traffic.

   
   
4. Suzie, on March 5th, 2013 at 08:27 Said:

   Sometimes I think that your posts are created just to rile me up. I have vowed never to comment here again, more than once. But, you know, self control is not my strong point, and Cherie is long-suffering and deserves better than being used as a conduit for my bile. So, I give up.

   I have three sons and a daughter, and they are all equally precious to me. I am not anti-man, not at all, but I strongly object to your views about women and how they ought to behave, and the limitations that they should put on themselves. Not every woman has a boyfriend or a father to pick them up. They should not have to need protection from predatory men.

   Maybe we should consider a curfew on all men during the hours of darkness? Seeing as they are so dangerous that no woman should walk out after twilight without being a target. That would solve the problem!

   
   
5. Suzie, on March 5th, 2013 at 08:52 Said:

   Of course, the blogs with integrity let the comments through. And they don’t edit.

   
   
6. amfortas, on March 5th, 2013 at 11:28 Said:

   It is fine to have a goal. Even at 60 yards. But like the sober girl walking alone at 1 am in a town or city that has lunatics ever present, even in small numbers, the first goal should be to grow a friggin’ brain.

   
   
7. James Higham, on March 5th, 2013 at 12:05 Said:

   Let’s look just at this:

   They should not have to need protection from predatory men.

   I completely agree – it should not be necessary. But this is the fundamental difference between this wishful thinking, we can do it all political mindset and a mindset of realism.

   Realism says that sadly, such is the case that women and girls need protection. The police are useless and the state doesn’t care – it only protects women insofar as it suits their political agenda of creating two new groups – the yahoo ASBO and the male wimp.

   So the whole feminist thing has created unrealistic expectations in women, playing on women’s natural desire to “have it all”, to be able to do anything – it’s a powerful emotional hook for the globalists to use on women.

   There are also hooks which get men in.

   Where did the new gang rape come from? Fatherless homes of course [many women NEVER appreciate how vital a father is in the home], this created the new disrespectful yahoo, nooky on tap [girls interpreting "I can do as I want" as "screw around"] and there it is.

   This girl was at a nightclub alone at 18 – that’s insane. To walk home when there are all these yahoos about created by fatherless homes and feckless fathers in homes where they remain, abusing women – and that’s a nasty cocktail for society.

   These things did not exist when men took their rightful place and women understood the necessity for the unbroken family. Then they started this fish on bicycle thing and the die was cast, the consequences now being seen. Children need both father and mother.

   Because so many women interpret this criticism [especially those steeped in the Feminist Narrative] as an assault on their rights by misogynists, there is no hope whatever of women finding protection. In fact, as the courts side more and more with women and let them off scot free when they themselves increasingly commit crimes – well documented – this turns the yahoos even more towards violence and the most effective violence is sexual violence.

   And what do good men do? Well, for a start, good men weren’t where that girl was walking home at 1 a.m. The only men present were those who were going to do precisely as they did.

   Meanwhile, with you and I at each other’s throats, Suzie, the PTB sit back and chuckle to themselves. Not a bad day’s work of sowing discord, chaos and ill will.
   James Higham recently posted…How much freedom do juries have to act undirected?

   
   
8. Suzie, on March 6th, 2013 at 07:30 Said:

   James, I do appreciate what you are saying. I (or my husband) would always pick our young daughter up late at night. However, I work in the city and I have a few minutes walk to the station. Same at the other end. If I get attacked by violent lunatics after dark, is that my fault? I’m just saying don’t blame the victim. It is not practical for anyone to pick me up and I refuse to live in fear, but I am uneasy walking in the dark even in affluent Sydney suburbia.

   What I don’t like about your attitude is the way that you lay blame. It is the woman’s fault for being so naive. But really, it isn’t. It’s violent men who are the problem….and before you start I know there are violent women but not on the same scale. When you highlight some gruesome act committed by a woman, usually revealed by that dreadful rag the “Daily Mail” it is precisely because it is unusual that it makes the news.

   Obviously you have a friend in Amfortas who is an older man with some bitterness which is evident in all his comments. I have walked alone at night. I think I have a brain. I hope for a society where the other half of the population can continue to walk at night without fear.
   And without being branded as prostitutes.

   When I was at university in the mid seventies, I was a long way from home. There was nobody to pick me up. I often did the forty minute walk back, alone at night. I never had any problem except for wolf whistles. Those were the days!

   
   
9. James Higham, on March 6th, 2013 at 17:14 Said:

   When I was at university in the mid seventies, I was a long way from home. There was nobody to pick me up. I often did the forty minute walk back, alone at night.

   Precisely – the 70s, just before the changes including the onslaught of PCism which included feminism, gaming, online porn, greed, all sorts of things mixed in together. Nightclubbing became a young person’s thing following the disco thing and moving into acid house parties. Chaperoning and curfews ceased.

   The heirs of the Frankfurt School began their cultural marxism in the 60s, going into the 70s and other things came along too – open plan “education” where the child was to “find himself” rather than be taught traditionally – there were so many factors, not all feminism by any means.

   Yet women themselves have spoken endlessly about the damage feminism has caused – now surely that needs to be heeded.
   James Higham recently posted…High society

   
   
10. Wolfie, on March 7th, 2013 at 13:45 Said:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2289518/Birmingham-stabbing-Schoolgirl-16-killed-bus-morning-rush-hour.html

    This girl was going to school. Not late at night, not alone.