Alternative view on heart disease

A surgeon changes his mind:

The discovery a few years ago that inflammation in the artery wall is the real cause of heart disease is slowly leading to a paradigm shift in how heart disease and other chronic ailments will be treated.

The long-established dietary recommendations have created epidemics of obesity and diabetes, the consequences of which dwarf any historical plague in terms of mortality, human suffering and dire economic consequences.

Despite the fact that 25% of the population takes expensive statin medications and despite the fact we have reduced the fat content of our diets, more Americans will die this year of heart disease than ever before.

Simply stated, without inflammation being present in the body, there is no way that cholesterol would accumulate in the wall of the blood vessel and cause heart disease and strokes. Without inflammation, cholesterol would move freely throughout the body as nature intended. It is inflammation that causes cholesterol to become trapped.

Inflammation is not complicated — it is quite simply your body’s natural defence to a foreign invader such as a bacteria, toxin or virus. The cycle of inflammation is perfect in how it protects your body from these bacterial and viral invaders. However, if we chronically expose the body to injury by toxins or foods the human body was never designed to process,a condition occurs called chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is just as harmful as acute inflammation is beneficial.

The rest of us have simply followed the recommended mainstream diet that is low in fat and high in polyunsaturated fats and carbohydrates, not knowing we were causing repeated injury to our blood vessels. This repeated injury creates chronic inflammation leading to heart disease, stroke, diabetes and obesity.

Let me repeat that: The injury and inflammation in our blood vessels is caused by the low fat diet recommended for years by mainstream medicine.

What are the biggest culprits of chronic inflammation? Quite simply, they are the overload of simple, highly processed carbohydrates (sugar, flour and all the products made from them) and the excess consumption of omega-6 vegetable oils like soybean, corn and sunflower that are found in many processed foods.

Take a moment to visualize rubbing a stiff brush repeatedly over soft skin until it becomes quite red and nearly bleeding. you kept this up several times a day, every day for five years. If you could tolerate this painful brushing, you would have a bleeding, swollen infected area that became worse with each repeated injury. This is a good way to visualize the inflammatory process that could be going on in your body right now.

5 Responses to “Alternative view on heart disease”

  1. Fascinating stuff. I won’t take statins but I’m on-board with all the rest of the standard-issue advice from the NHS. Re-think underway. Thank you


  2. Actually this has been known for some time – as have the risks associated with statins.
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fat-Cholesterol-are-Good-You/dp/919755538X


  3. Should we sue, or should we hang, the reckless buggers who churned out the government dietary propaganda for so long?

    Happily, I learned this lesson some years ago, courtesy of the WWW. I hope my GPs learn it soon.


  4. So many experts: so much conflicting dogma, advice, recommendation and prescription. I do not ‘disbelieve’ this Dwight chappie (despite his sudden reversal of story) but I do not see where he shows clearly the mechanisms that link this ingested bit to that ‘inflammation’. Typical doctor.

    I was as much in the dark about the type 2 diabetes my doc said I had. I had to look up the biochemistry on Khan Academy, then take her to it and show her what she was diagnosing and how it worked. She hadn’t a clue and was fascinated by the KA diagrams.

    I can see a further deep conversation coming !


  5. Sigh. Yes.
    James Higham recently posted…Some current reading at OoLMy Profile