Blair in context
Beware the pod people
Blair really needs to be seen in context.
If the malaise infesting western society can be characterized as a malignant cancer, then Blair is just a visible melanoma, a growth, a manifestation of that cancer.
If you look at society and politics in the first half of the last century and compare it to the second half, the same forces have been at work. The roots of the demise in true educational research, for example, lie in such manifestations as the Lincoln School and this blog has covered that before. The roots of the breakdown of marriage, promiscuity and Planned Parenthood are not some new golden age but due to silent propaganda stemming from the early C20th.
It is at once socialist and globalist, with all sorts of adherents, from Rockefeller to Piaget, to House, to Warburg to Keynes, Roosevelt, Mandelson, Strong and so on – they are legion and many of the lesser known figures have done the most damage, in their own small way. Gordon Davidson and Corrine McLaughlin are behind the World Service Initiative and the Valdez Principles which spawned Goreism and everyone knows what damage the climate scam has done.
Returning to Blair, a proven liar, a weak man of limited intellect but overweening ambition, Etienne Davignon answered a journo about Bilderberg nefariousness that they, the Bilderbergers, were “excellent talent spotters”, no more, no less.
He was not wrong. They identify, just as the excrescent offshoot of the ODPM, Middleton’s Common Purpose do, men and women of a certain type – limited in independent thought, easily pressed to the cause, lured by the promise of really “being someone” when the present cankerous mess is swept away and the new order can finally be put in place. Have a look inside Chatham House.
It’s so old, so monotonous, it’s never changed. As this blog has quoted many times, Agatha Christie nailed it when she described this sort of person in NorM [1941]:
You do not know the force of German propaganda. It appeals to something in man, some desire or lust for power. These people were ready to betray their country not for money; but in a kind of megalomaniacal pride in what they – they themselves – were going to achieve for that country. In every land it has always been the same. It is the Cult of Lucifer — Lucifer, Son of the Morning. Pride and a desire for personal glory.
You can see it in this spoof below on Gordon Brown. If you look beyond Gordo at Cherie Blair and the way she is acting in the clip – the limited mind which is so pleased with itself and look at the woman to her left – that gives some sort of idea. Look at Toynbee at the Grauniad. Big players, they think, movers and shakers but actually just useful idiots, pushing the agenda for’ard …
… and always with an eye to ripping off the taxpayer to further their lifestyles. These are the secure ones, part of the oligarchy which runs things, physical and mental wrecks after they’ve done their worst and yet secure in the knowledge that they are valued members of the global push. Except that they are not valued – they are devalued. Svali put it well about them in 2000:
These are NOT nice people and they use and manipulate others viciously. They cut their eye teeth on status, power, and money. I have given all of that up to leave, and am glad to be away from it now, although I do miss some of my friends, and at times I miss the respect of being a leader.
Interesting that Blair should write about being a manipulator. These are truly sad, empty people and just the type which Geoff Mulgan’s Common Purpose [via the Marxist driven Demos] targets to train in groupthink – established leaders in society, so their blurb states and what are they being trained in?
“Leadership beyond authority.”
Now you translate that into ordinary English for me please – whatever can it mean? At what stage in proceedings do these people rise and take over the reins? Surprise, surprise – they’re already in there and operating. If it’s a key manager or chief officer, odds are not low that this might be a hideously expensively trained CP graduate – have a close look at Yorkshire Forward.
It’s like those sci-fi films where the discoverer of the plan to take over the world goes to his superior officer, only to find out that the officer is … [drumroll] … one of Them.
Blair, of course, should be brought to trial but never will. Apoplectic conservatives may dream of such a thing but of course, the establishment is global socialist and protects its own. At all levels of society, from politicians to bloggers, there they are – quietly promoting the agenda.
I meet them each day and say nothing – you never quite know who’s a podperson and who’s a member of the human race.
Filed under: Politics & economics
Blair may still be brought to justice. Just not UK justice.
I thought it was interesting that Blair says he realised the unsuitability and unstable nature of Brown, even his economic incompetence at an early stage but does not explain why he did nothing. He was Prime Minister; the only person with the power to sack Brown yet he talks as if the power was somehow not his. Is this a tacit admission that other powers reign?
I like the way that Svali conflates “respect” with “leader” as if a leader automatically commands respect, it was, more likely, sycophancy, the loss of which should not be lamented.
Woolfie – absolutely nail on head, another example of delayed contrition is the senior military officer who, on retirement and in receipt of pension and gratuity, castigates the MoD for the lack of suitable equipment.
As for CP, fast track promotion (mentioned recently elsewhere) was the shoe horn into all British institutions
including the armed forces and constabulary.
Change isn’t a consequence just of intellectual fashions though. It also builds on real changes e.g. ” The roots of the breakdown of marriage, promiscuity..” depended partly on antibiotics. Once the pox doesn’t kill you, everything is different.
What’s to be done then Higham?
PS: The woman sitting to the left of Ms Booth is Lady Prescott.
What is the name of the Bunuel film in which the peasants, having overthrown the squirarchy, feast like pigs at the recently deposed squire’s table, thinking themselves now his equal?