<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting published</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/02/09/getting-published/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/02/09/getting-published/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter McGrath</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/02/09/getting-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7802</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter McGrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/?p=6772#comment-7802</guid>
		<description>Thanks James. Sometimes the spleen must be vented and I&#039;m glad you found it post provoking. That was only one molar vitriol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks James. Sometimes the spleen must be vented and I&#8217;m glad you found it post provoking. That was only one molar vitriol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherryPie</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/02/09/getting-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7613</link>
		<dc:creator>CherryPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/?p=6772#comment-7613</guid>
		<description>That was the stance of the big publishing houses.  They know the formula that sells and will only take on those kinds of work because it means easy cash for them.  The problem is that they are not allowed and use their instincts to introduce interesting new writers with refreshing ideas.  This leads to a books going very  much like the MSM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the stance of the big publishing houses.  They know the formula that sells and will only take on those kinds of work because it means easy cash for them.  The problem is that they are not allowed and use their instincts to introduce interesting new writers with refreshing ideas.  This leads to a books going very  much like the MSM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Higham</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/02/09/getting-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7612</link>
		<dc:creator>James Higham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/?p=6772#comment-7612</guid>
		<description>Ah yes - the proverbial hen&#039;s teeth - the independent publisher.  One way is for people to combine and self-publish together but there is no guarantee of quality of work across the range then.  Distribution is then the problem too.

To an extent, the literary agents are right - there is a lot of dross out there and I include my original version of Obsession I hawked around.  The one now is probably &quot;quite OK&quot; but I&#039;d claim no more.

I agree with what you say and would add that things are formulaic but they argue it&#039;s because such like sells.  Perhaps the trick is to actually forget selling one&#039;s own and become an independent publisher instead.

Calum, Angus - stick at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes &#8211; the proverbial hen&#8217;s teeth &#8211; the independent publisher.  One way is for people to combine and self-publish together but there is no guarantee of quality of work across the range then.  Distribution is then the problem too.</p>
<p>To an extent, the literary agents are right &#8211; there is a lot of dross out there and I include my original version of Obsession I hawked around.  The one now is probably &#8220;quite OK&#8221; but I&#8217;d claim no more.</p>
<p>I agree with what you say and would add that things are formulaic but they argue it&#8217;s because such like sells.  Perhaps the trick is to actually forget selling one&#8217;s own and become an independent publisher instead.</p>
<p>Calum, Angus &#8211; stick at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherryPie</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/02/09/getting-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7607</link>
		<dc:creator>CherryPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/?p=6772#comment-7607</guid>
		<description>I always struggled in recent years with how novels were very samey and that there was nothing new and refreshing.  On one of my holidays I met someone who was in publishing and that enlightened me.

The way to go is to find an independent publisher who is willing to take a risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always struggled in recent years with how novels were very samey and that there was nothing new and refreshing.  On one of my holidays I met someone who was in publishing and that enlightened me.</p>
<p>The way to go is to find an independent publisher who is willing to take a risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angus dei</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/02/09/getting-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7490</link>
		<dc:creator>angus dei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/?p=6772#comment-7490</guid>
		<description>Oh well, there goes the &quot;get rich quick&quot; scheme then:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well, there goes the &#8220;get rich quick&#8221; scheme then:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calumcarr</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2010/02/09/getting-published/comment-page-1/#comment-7489</link>
		<dc:creator>Calumcarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/?p=6772#comment-7489</guid>
		<description>Just as well that I blog and call my poems &quot;poetry&quot; without any expectation of ever making money.

Perhaps I should sell my body.  

On second thoughts I&#039;d make much more money by writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as well that I blog and call my poems &#8220;poetry&#8221; without any expectation of ever making money.</p>
<p>Perhaps I should sell my body.  </p>
<p>On second thoughts I&#8217;d make much more money by writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

