http://www.newsweek.com/id/216903

Lord Nazh says:
December 12, 2009 at 19:46

Completely OT James but thought you’d enjoy this clip

http://video.foxnews.com/12407479/justice-served?test=latestnews

The most interesting thing to me is that Guede on the run made a skype call in which he stated Knox wasn’t in the house. He also never even mentioned Knox as a murderer when we was brought back from Germany. It wasn’t until he learned that the prosecution wanted to put her at the scene that he cooked up a version that included her and Sollecito.

The prosecutor has a history of being a delusional fantasist cooking up stories as elaborate as this alleged group sex crime. The prosecutor’s story also changed. Both he and the Judge claimed to know the story and be already formulating the conviction in their minds at the very start of the trial. Their versions also included the bar owner, but then shifted to Guede. Once the prosecution had more information about Knox and Sollecito’s alibis, he and his team also shifted the estimated time of death by 2 hours so it could better fit their version of Knox-Sollecito involvement. It is entirely possible the suggestion of the bar owner was put to Knox by the police.

If you are going to implicate anyone of a murder when you are supposedly with them in a sordid group act, why not implicate Guede who ran away guilty and whose DNA was all over the scene? That they didn’t suggests they didn’t know he was there.

The police don’t even have a murder weapon. They pulled a random knife from a kitchen drawer at Sollecitos house so of course it would have DNA on it. It wasn’t even matched to the knife stains at the scene or the wounds in her neck.

I think Guede acted alone. What has been lost in all this is that Meredith was the one who invited him into the house.

She is detached and rather odd and I also think the suggestion the Knox family were going to make money with a book deal on all this is disgusting. I just don’t believe there is sufficient evidence even circumstantial that the two kids are guilty of a group orgy style murder.

Its pretty water tight. Not 100% but at least 80%.

I can sympathise with that. I have seen it happen to other people and it has happened to me!

In the end it does not come down to us, it comes down to exhaustive consideration of the evidence, as it always had to be and of course – she was guilty. I would have thought Alison’s sympathies would have been with the poor victim.

Sort of like not seeing much evidence of a lady being pregnant – just a little bit, Wolfie.

Tiberius – yes I can. People give themselves away when they least expect they are. They only have to act and talk.

It’s certainly not anything to be pleased about but it is pleasing that the Kercher family saw it come to an end. They’re the main ones now.

Lastly as a related point, her nickname Foxy Knoxy was supposedly according to the guardian given to her because of her skills at football- not for any other reasons. I understand that given your ethical system a girl who sleeps around is not someone you sympathise with, but are there any reasons to dislike morally a girl who is a scheming centre forward!

You should be more wary when the tabloids are spoon-feeding larger than life characterisations – especially of women whom they love to fashion into modern witches James. Your are starting to sound like JHL with his home-spun misogyny.

The headmaster at my old prep-school was a local JP and believed like you that he could just read people’s characters. So every time I was brought to him having been caught fighting the larger bullies who had been terrorising me I was the one who was punished.