Our green and pleasant land
We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind, We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us: to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy.
You ask, What is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory – victory – at all costs, victory, in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realised; no survival for the British Empire; no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal.
But I take up my task with buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. At this time I feel entitled to claim the aid of all, and I say, ‘Come, then, let us go forward together with our united strength.’
Sue of Mumbled Vociferation mentions the Frankfurt School:
The creation of the EU was based on the teachings of the Frankfurt School. It’s so obvious, its embarrassing! Look at the main bullet points for their plans to further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):
1. The creation of racism offences.
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family
Cassandra, a more intensely political writer [check out Politaea], adds:
I agree with Sue. It makes sense. The Frankfurt School was a KGB trojan horse/fifth column inserted into the West to demoralize it with cultural Marxism. The counter cultural generation and their children live and breath these memes. The entire self loathing thing is Frankfurt School.
The EU is currently setting up a system for the “fair” distribution of immigrants over the union. My guess is they’ll make a division as they did 40 years ago when I know the Netherlands were “awarded” guest workers (who never left) from Turkey and Morocco. Germany got Turks and Italians, etc. etc. They’ll do a similar thing again.
European history shows that elements in the major cities, the same families and the same names which spawned Hitler and Merkel, referred to by people as diverse as Churchill and escapee Svali and referred to in diverse publications from such people as Quigley, House, Wilson and Strong, all say the same thing – that there is a most powerful force at large, it is anti-human in nature in that it wishes to enslave the common man, it manifests itself through the royal families of Europe, the old money deep in Europe, especially in Switzerland, through the round table groups and through the wannabe elitists like Mandelson, Sutherland, Clarke, Balls and Millipede.
One of its dearest wishes, not the only wish but one of the dearest, is to take England apart – Napoleon’s Bonny Bunch of Roses. In N or M, Christie captures the concerns of the thinking public of the time when she puts in this dialogue:
“Incredible!” said Tommy.
Grant shook his head.
“You do not know the force of German propaganda. It appeals to something in man, some desire or lust for power. These people were ready to betray their country, not for money; but in a kind of megalomaniacal pride in what they – they themselves – were going to achieve for that country.
In every land it has always been the same. It is the Cult of Lucifer — Lucifer, Son of the Morning. Pride and a desire for personal glory.” [“N or M”, 1941]
Christie had her German put it this away:
It’s people like you who will be needed in the new state – the state which will arise in this country when your present imbecile government is vanquished. We want to turn some of our enemies into friends – those who are worthwhile.
[O]ur leader does not intend to conquer this country in the way you all think. He aims at creating a new Britain, a Britain strong in its own power – a Britain not ruled by Germans but by Englishmen and the best type of Englishmen – with brains, breeding and courage, a brave new world, as Shakespeare puts it.
We want to do away with muddle and inefficiency, with bribery and corruption, with self-seeking and money-grubbing … you would be surprised how many there are in this country, as in others, who have sympathy with our aims. Among us all, we will create a New Europe, a Europe of peace and progress. Try and see it that way because I can assure you – it is that way. [“N or M”, 1941]
Compelling, magnetic, seemingly flawless logic, the greater good served by a European Union dedicated to prosperity and a New Europe … based on extermination of unwanted races, with serf races distributed over Europe as the worker ants and the elites, the enlightened ones, the CP graduates, for example, running the show and dedicated to the common purpose for which they’ve tirelessly strived since well before Amsterdam.
The only difference I see from the WW2 scenario is that money is more nakedly sought by the “elite” these days and it appears to vie with ideology for preeminence.
1066, 1588, Napoleon’s time, the late C19th Marxism, WW1 and WW2 – all have seen a partial goal of taking over Britannia but there is a second, more insidious goal underlying this – the dismemberment of England itself and the grinding of that nation into the ground.
What better way than to officially break it up whilst it still subsidizes Scotland and Wales plus the poorer nations of the EU, getting back for its trouble zero euros, except through the regions, as official regions.
This post provides links showing that this is how the EU is operating.
Here is a post listing the Westminster traitors who colluded in selling out our nation to an oligarchical cabal intent on destroying it, all in the name of unsustainable globalist ideology.
Here is the Albion Alliance site, where you can sign up to help defend this nation, here is its forum, here are some draft letters you can use, if you like, to write to your MP and other candidates, asking them to restore our voice via a referendum on Europe, and here is Andrew Allison’s conservative view on the current situation, here is Ian Parker-Joseph’s article on the border tightening, here is Witterings from Witney’s article on more and more centralized control, the gradual tightening of the screws on us.
North Northwester recognizes the uphill task of gathering people together sufficiently to insist that this country belongs to us:
It’s a huge mountain to climb, but all successful movements started with a few outsiders….Or not so few. This year at the EU elections, UKIP polled over half as many as the Tories : 2,498,226 against 4,198,394, and 100,000 more than Labour.
Outfits such as the Taxpayers’ Alliance are adding to the movement against the EU, and there’s a lot to be done to keep the issue live and to make it real in peoples’ minds.
What have we North West Province imperial subjects got to lose?
Indeed, what have any of us poor citizens of these isles got to lose?
Pause for light relief
There’s still room for a laugh it seems:
Comparing Peter Mandelson to ‘manure’ is not offensive says BBC Trust
Comparing Lord Peter Mandelson to “manure” who attracts controversy “like flies” is not offensive, according to a ruling made by the BBC’s governing body.
Tut tut, BBC – now is that nice?
Filed under: Politics & economics, Society & human issues















Ta for link James. Methinks that Sue far from mumbles, which is probably why she has been ‘muffled’. Nice articlde, well said!
Terrifying!
She wasn’t muffled but nobody could understand her mumbling.
James has now said it out loud.
James,
The more I read the more I think we should form a political party – the present ones are not going to change their ways in the foreseeable future.
Ivan, the main reason we haven’t done that is that we need the support of people in the conservative/libertarian area. We have people in AA from three parties – Conservatives, UKIP and LPUK plus dissatisfied adherents to other parties and non party political people.
The message hasn’t sunk in yet that under their current leaderships, the Big Three have sold us down the drain. As a Tory, that is pure chagrin because if anyone should be standing up against the EU, it is them.
To run as a party, we’d need to get an infrastructure in place and candidates for 600 plus constituencies, as well as a platform for governing which goes beyond one or two issues. I’m sure it’s being thought about and the danger is that so many groups would like to step in and capture this fertile ground.
The danger of fragmentation is high. When non Big Three Eurosceptic spokespeople go all tribal and silent on what they should be speaking out about, refusing to support any other group because they are not at the centre of it, you get an idea of what we’re up against.
So far, AA is a pressure group, hoping all other similar groups will support it, as we support them and therefore not subject to the strictures political parties are. If we went party, we’d need massive publicity and a great infrastructure.
I’ll do a post on this.
[...] @tanyaross nourishing obscurity: "Our green and pleasant land" http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/12/03/our-green-and-pleasant-land/ Posted on Thu 03 Dec 10:34 retweet 0 votes RT @CassandraTroy: @tanyaross nourishing [...]
The writing is on the wall. You may not be aware across the pond but on the continent they distinguish between two rival economic systems: the Rhineland system (or mixed economy, the 3rd way, combining “capitalism light” and “socialism”) and the dog-eats-dog, cut throat capitalism of the Anglo-Saxon model (the UK and the US) (Howard Dean talks about it here: http://www.aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=10643&posts=2). Obama c.s. are taking care of business in the US: they’re taking it apart!
Labour apparently has not demolished the City thoroughly enough to their taste.
My guess is we’re all to fit the same statist, collectivist, Hegelian model (the state dispenses and withdraws group rights and priviliges as it sees fit). That no one says so openly, shows the content of their conscience. It fits the Common Purpose agenda to a t.
This always was an anti Enlightenment operation: anti capitalism, anti individual, anti liberty, and anti reason (look what ClimateGate has done for science!!!!)
There’s hardly any awareness of what’s going on. We’ve had to piece this together over the last couple of years or so. We need a global counter movement for the preservation of Enlightenment values, or we’re dog’s breakfast.
Perhaps you’ve seen it before. But I can’t resist posting once more a link to the eye opening Bezmenev interview about the KGB’s demoralization of the West: http://vodpod.com/watch/228973-just-doing-his-job
Cassandra.
You speak well.
The original financing for marxist movements, etc, etc, came from Wall Street entities, the precursors of the current entities.
The original thinkers, long ago, behind the marxist/socialist theories, were financed by the originators of debt based finance, and central banks. Inherent in, and resulting from, the structures created, was the eventual impoverishment of the “middle” class.
Blair and his third way hastened the break down, destabilisation, of society.
Words we would recognise decades ago now have totally different meanings. Smoke and mirrors.
A large part of the final years destruction has centred around the financial destruction of the west, with its individualism.
Bernanke is up for a second term. Some folks don’t think he has done a good job.
Other folks would say he follows Greenspans determined destruction of the western ethos.
It is only when you put all the various themes together that the great landscape emerges for perusal.
This is the prepared speech by a senator who thinks thus.
http://bunning.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=NewsCenter.NewsReleases&ContentRecord_id=556a0e84-feaa-d20f-2867-6793698d6974
Prior to, and following from, the time of Bernankes appearance, the $ received considerable support internally in the US. Clearly “finance” wishes his renomination.
“Climate” nonsense is something I have been aware of for many years.
The ultimate beneficiaries of climate taxes will be the same bloodline that financed the thinkers behind the Marxist socialist crap, the originators of debt based financing, mentioned above, before Wall street was created.
Either today or tomorrow morning for the next post.