<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sovereignty and rule by vote-meter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/</link>
	<description>Drawn back, as if to a horror movie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:50:59 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Higham</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2536</link>
		<dc:creator>James Higham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2536</guid>
		<description>This is too big a topic - this will be part three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is too big a topic &#8211; this will be part three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord T</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2534</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2534</guid>
		<description>James,

And would the tests be about real world stuff like balancing a chequebook or just how to make sure that commas were in the right place.   The questions should reflect real world issues and not just a list of stupid questions like the citizenship one.   It should have relevance to what is going on and show an understanding that when you vote for X then Y will be the payment.   Not like California where they can vote for low taxes but big state benefits.

It would be interesting seeing what you think should be in such a test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>And would the tests be about real world stuff like balancing a chequebook or just how to make sure that commas were in the right place.   The questions should reflect real world issues and not just a list of stupid questions like the citizenship one.   It should have relevance to what is going on and show an understanding that when you vote for X then Y will be the payment.   Not like California where they can vote for low taxes but big state benefits.</p>
<p>It would be interesting seeing what you think should be in such a test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rule by votemeter 2 &#124; nourishing obscurity</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>Rule by votemeter 2 &#124; nourishing obscurity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>[...] the first part, it was mooted that we could, today, easily move to voting from home via votemeter and that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the first part, it was mooted that we could, today, easily move to voting from home via votemeter and that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Higham</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>James Higham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>The difficulty is in the formulation of the questions and that would be the subject of hot debate.  As the initial questions would be the subject of a poll and would be set by &quot;experts&quot; from three universities, most like and as those &quot;experts&quot; are Marxist, most like, then the questions could well be skewed.

If, however, reps from a cross-section of professions were to set the proposed questions, they could have the raging battle first and would be obliged to consider the public&#039;s suggestions not unlike in flag design competitions but needing to explain why they rejected certain questions.

It could be further enhanced by only public suggestions agreed by three or more currently registered voters would be considered.

Anyway, once these are thrashed out, the initial set would be put and registered voters invited to go to their local council offices and take the test.

After a quota of, say, 20% of voters had passed the test, then the initial votemeters would be available at major outlets and you&#039;d need to produce your certificate or electronic confirmation from the government to buy the set.

Now the parliamentary committee, association, whatever, puts the set of questions up for editing and the new voters can tweak the list.  The old set of questions runs for six months and at the end of that time, the new set is put in place for the period of one year.

Thereafter, the questions, which are up for review all year round, are altered once a year to reflect the new voting over the past year across the country.

Thus the test is slowly honed and the people educated at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difficulty is in the formulation of the questions and that would be the subject of hot debate.  As the initial questions would be the subject of a poll and would be set by &#8220;experts&#8221; from three universities, most like and as those &#8220;experts&#8221; are Marxist, most like, then the questions could well be skewed.</p>
<p>If, however, reps from a cross-section of professions were to set the proposed questions, they could have the raging battle first and would be obliged to consider the public&#8217;s suggestions not unlike in flag design competitions but needing to explain why they rejected certain questions.</p>
<p>It could be further enhanced by only public suggestions agreed by three or more currently registered voters would be considered.</p>
<p>Anyway, once these are thrashed out, the initial set would be put and registered voters invited to go to their local council offices and take the test.</p>
<p>After a quota of, say, 20% of voters had passed the test, then the initial votemeters would be available at major outlets and you&#8217;d need to produce your certificate or electronic confirmation from the government to buy the set.</p>
<p>Now the parliamentary committee, association, whatever, puts the set of questions up for editing and the new voters can tweak the list.  The old set of questions runs for six months and at the end of that time, the new set is put in place for the period of one year.</p>
<p>Thereafter, the questions, which are up for review all year round, are altered once a year to reflect the new voting over the past year across the country.</p>
<p>Thus the test is slowly honed and the people educated at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sackerson</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator>Sackerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2519</guid>
		<description>Sorry, typo, meant moniker, obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, typo, meant moniker, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sackerson</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2518</link>
		<dc:creator>Sackerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2518</guid>
		<description>Judging by Deogolwulf&#039;s miniker, he would probably prefer Anglo-Saxon kingship. &quot;It&#039;s good to be the King&quot;, or even a housecarl, but I don&#039;t fancy being a slave or bondsman.

The requirement for an educational qualification was, I believe, one of the strategies used to exclude black people from voting in some Southern states of the USA. And now there are those on the interblogs mooting a property qualification. Anyone for a rotten borough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging by Deogolwulf&#8217;s miniker, he would probably prefer Anglo-Saxon kingship. &#8220;It&#8217;s good to be the King&#8221;, or even a housecarl, but I don&#8217;t fancy being a slave or bondsman.</p>
<p>The requirement for an educational qualification was, I believe, one of the strategies used to exclude black people from voting in some Southern states of the USA. And now there are those on the interblogs mooting a property qualification. Anyone for a rotten borough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherryPie</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>CherryPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>The idea of qualifying for a vote is a good one.  But how we choose to do it is crucial.

The quiz test you mention here for example:

You would qualify and so would my Dad, it is in the balance whether or not my Mum or I would qualify.  That is because our learning base took a different path.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of qualifying for a vote is a good one.  But how we choose to do it is crucial.</p>
<p>The quiz test you mention here for example:</p>
<p>You would qualify and so would my Dad, it is in the balance whether or not my Mum or I would qualify.  That is because our learning base took a different path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Higham</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>James Higham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>Oh it&#039;s certainly meritocracy and I say why not?  I like the idea of having to qualify to vote because my vote would then mean more.  As long as anyone had the chance to do the test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh it&#8217;s certainly meritocracy and I say why not?  I like the idea of having to qualify to vote because my vote would then mean more.  As long as anyone had the chance to do the test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherryPie</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator>CherryPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2501</guid>
		<description>My comment on this occasion had nothing to do with politics ;-) xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment on this occasion had nothing to do with politics <img src='http://nourishingobscurity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QM</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2499</link>
		<dc:creator>QM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2499</guid>
		<description>It might work though the accusations of setting up a meritocracy would be thrown at those using it. Technology is certainly there too, but would peoples interest be maintained and would they be able to follow the debates, There would be dangers of filibustering too until only those who support or want to kill the measure remain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might work though the accusations of setting up a meritocracy would be thrown at those using it. Technology is certainly there too, but would peoples interest be maintained and would they be able to follow the debates, There would be dangers of filibustering too until only those who support or want to kill the measure remain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Higham</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>James Higham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>Sackers, Cherie and Deogolwulf - the post was flying a kite and seeing how it flew.  I&#039;m actually intrigued by the politics of all three of you - Deogolwulf&#039;s being the most inaccessible of the three.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sackers, Cherie and Deogolwulf &#8211; the post was flying a kite and seeing how it flew.  I&#8217;m actually intrigued by the politics of all three of you &#8211; Deogolwulf&#8217;s being the most inaccessible of the three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deogolwulf</title>
		<link>http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/comment-page-1/#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>Deogolwulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nourishingobscurity.com/2009/11/23/sovereignty-and-rule-by-vote-meter/#comment-2494</guid>
		<description>So, your friend was not quite right then: you are an updated and more radical version of an eighteenth-century radical Whig. 

&quot;They can get knotted.&quot;

They are not going to get knotted. 

&quot;Alien systems do not get a look in and are just shouldered out.&quot;

I hope that includes democracy. 

&quot;the centre of politics&quot; --- the extreme left-wing politics of yesteryear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, your friend was not quite right then: you are an updated and more radical version of an eighteenth-century radical Whig. </p>
<p>&#8220;They can get knotted.&#8221;</p>
<p>They are not going to get knotted. </p>
<p>&#8220;Alien systems do not get a look in and are just shouldered out.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope that includes democracy. </p>
<p>&#8220;the centre of politics&#8221; &#8212; the extreme left-wing politics of yesteryear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
